"Becoming pointless" - Everyone wants the same law change after the final Lions test

Despite aiming for a historic 3-0 Lions series sweep – something not seen since the 1927 Argentina tour – Andy Farrell’s men couldn’t handle Australia’s power game. The hosts took full advantage of the conditions, sealing a deserved 22-12 win in torrential rain.

RUCK’s Lions content is powered by ISUZU. 

The result also brought an end to the Lions’ perfect record on Australian soil. Hopes of matching the legendary unbeaten 1974 tour were washed away.

But while the defeat stung, it’s the state of the scrum that’s sparked widespread backlash online.

One fan asked: 

Another fumed: "What's the point of a hooker anymore. Hookers don't hook."

A third didn’t hold back: "These scrum feeds are getting out of control. What is the Georgian ref watching,"

And a former front-rower chimed in: "As a former front rower, the scrum is a farce at the minute due to the stupid feeds."

Another fan wrote: "The scrum is becoming pointless. Neither the Lions or Wallabies have fed the ball straight in THREE tests,"

The message is clear – fans want action. Because right now, the set-piece is turning into a set-joke.

me from a place of respect for the game and a desire to see it continue to thrive.

World Rugby has made plenty of changes in recent years, and these ideas could be next.

Rugby has changed significantly over the years, and one of the biggest shifts is how the bench is used. These days, teams often bring on almost an entirely new forward pack late in the game. Big, fresh players crash into tired defenders, making the final 20 minutes less about skill and endurance, and more about brute force. Many fans and former players feel this has turned rugby into a collision sport rather than a contest of stamina and intelligence.

Reducing the number of substitutions would encourage players to pace themselves. Space would open up in the second half, creating more opportunities for creative play rather than endless phases of pick-and-go. It would reward fitness, smart decision-making, and those capable of performing for the full 80 minutes.

Fewer substitutions wouldn’t just make the game more exciting—it would make it fairer, safer, and more in line with the spirit of what rugby has always been about.

With the rise of 6–2 and even 7–1 bench splits, pioneered by Rassie Erasmus, the trend seems to be heading in the opposite direction. That’s all the more reason to act now.

The caterpillar ruck is one of those tactics that, while legal, just doesn’t sit right with many who love the game. It involves players lining up behind a ruck in a queue, giving the scrum-half extra time and space to kick.

It slows the game to a crawl, gives the defence no real chance to compete, and often feels more like a way to kill momentum than build it.

It may be clever, but it’s not entertaining. Fans want to see fast, hard-fought rugby—not box-kick after box-kick with a queue of bodies shielding the kicker. Eliminating or limiting the caterpillar ruck would speed up the game and reintroduce unpredictability at the breakdown.

This isn’t about removing strategy. It’s about keeping the game flowing and true to what makes rugby exciting: dynamic, contested play.

Referees have improved at calling “use it” earlier, which helps speed things up, but more needs to be done. Getting rid of the caterpillar ruck would go a long way toward fixing the issue.

The 20-minute red card was introduced as a middle ground—punishing dangerous play without completely ruining a match. But let’s be honest: it sends the wrong message. If a player commits a reckless or dangerous act, 20 minutes off the field doesn’t always feel like enough—especially for serious offenses, like a high tackle that could end an opponent’s game or season.

Rugby has made major strides in protecting players, especially around the head and neck. Keeping the full red card—where the offending team plays a man down for the rest of the match—reaffirms that commitment. It makes the consequences clear: cross the line, and your team suffers. That’s how you change behaviour.

Yes, it’s tough. Sometimes it may seem harsh. But safety must come first. It’s about respecting the game and the long-term health of every player on the field.

In many ways, the 20-minute red gives officials a cop-out. It’s often seen as the easy option to avoid controversy—even when a full red card is justified.